I was reading an article where this writer was saying that celebrities should be shunned and they shouldn't be role models I mean this reporter was really going on about it as if they did something to him personally or he just has some anger issues or an unresolved vendetta. I was reading this and I first thought to myself okay so this is what's considered news? Or something that people should really consider as a deep well panned out thought? Then I thought about how many people would read it and go along with everything he says, at times they out number the independent thinkers and it's really mind boggling to say the least. Anyway, I thought I would share my view on the matter and see what people actually think.
I for one think that this columnist forgot that celebrities are human and are going to make mistakes. The difference is everything their doing is going to magnified it's like a fishbowl and everybody is watching. But the people following that closely to make such hard judgements remind me of the curious salivating cat just waiting for the moment to pounce and devour the fish in the bowl that's unaware of the danger lurking and starting right at it. I'm not the one to point fingers because that's not my place and I just want to ask writers that practice these tactics of criticizing and judging so harshly who gave them that position? I never read that in a reporters or columnist's' job description. But I guess the First Amendment and other laws protect them to do something so cowardly because we all know they would never tell the person or persons they're writing about their true feelings face to face.
I want you all to think before you are dying to read the article or blog entry whatever media you're using. Think about the source and consider all sides in the matter before you form an opinion. Also take into consideration if the shoe was on the other foot, how would you cope with that? Don't rush and say I wouldn't care because contrary to popular belief words does hurt! That is why I'm glad that many of them decide to get blogs and join in on other social media that's hot right now because many media outlets love to ignore press releases. They dismiss them as the celeb's people attempting damage control if it's a negative spun article. What's another reason why they would dismiss something valid or the truth? It chips away at the lies and kill their juicy story.
What sells? What keeps loyal subscribers these days? What causes a ratings bonanza?
Controversy. Scandal, The Inside Scoop....
Just think about it.........
Before you rush out to buy something that could be chopped full of B.S. is it really worth that money? Is it worth making sleazy people rich as they are defaming another person and at times putting labels on them that can never die down or be removed? Is it worth it?
No comments:
Post a Comment